Say you are at a company and you use 3DS Max. Lets give an example that does not work yet, but could. Fundamentally, this means that an IPFS aware application can issue a ipfs:\ call, just like a file:\ call, and receive a file. IPFS is a filesystem while Bittorent is a download system. Though they could use IPFS to broaden their market. What it actually is will make CDNs less necessary than they are today. IPFS can be considered a caching scheme in rough terms, but it is a side effect of the design. You should be able to go to a normal page, and that page will have a piece of javascript that will download parts of the page, or video or whatever over the IPFS system without interaction. IPFS is a rethink on how data is transferred, and will ideally be transparent to the user. It is a form of content caching, only the user is part of the caching scheme, and has to opt in to it. It might benefit the user in the long run by ensuring access to content if the server is hit hard, but the server gets the most benefit, by reducing the costs to host the content. Or more precisely, it handles files in exactly the same way we currently handle files, with an added layer on top to benefit the server. Bitorrent's Project Maelstrom is a system designed to handle downloading webpages and web content such as images and video.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |